ASSAF report assesses criminalisation of sexual diversityPublished on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 16:32
Stigmatisation and criminalisation of homosexuality have made public health interventions, particularly regarding HIV prevention and treatment, difficult to implement effectively. This study, which was undertaken in collaboration with the Uganda National Academy of Sciences, examined evidence that would provide answers to a set of critical questions related to gender diversity and human sexuality. Questions covered the roles of biology and the environment in determining gender diversity and human sexuality; whether sexual orientation could be altered through therapy; whether claims that same-sex orientations posed a threat to others were authentic; and what were the public health consequences of criminalising same-sex sexual orientations.
The report also identified the most critical unanswered research questions that could shape future research. The report concludes that it is evident that contemporary science increasingly recognises the wide range of natural variation in human sexuality, sexual orientations and gender identities. “Contemporary science appropriately describes the range of human variation, very little of which can justifiably be termed abnormal.” This report suggests that governments have a duty to consider scientific perspectives and draw on the most current scientific knowledge when creating policy and enacting laws. Significant and even path-breaking research in a variety of fields has been undertaken in the recent past into sexuality and sexual orientation, but much of this research is not widely known to policymakers yet, nor is much of it in the public domain.
The report concludes that there is substantial biological evidence for the diversity of human sexualities and for sexual orientations in particular. Studies have found significant linkage between male sexual orientation and regions of the X chromosome. This particular region on the X chromosome is also associated with other elements of sexual development. These findings, initially published in 1993 and confirmed in 2014, directly associate a particular trait (same-sex orientation) to genetic material for at least some same-sex-attracted men.
While less well studied, there is also considerable evidence for a biological component for same-sex orientation in women. Other conclusions of the report are:
- No evidence could be found to support the notion that sexual orientation can be acquired through contact with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) persons.
- There is a lack of evidence to support the idea that the way parents bring up their children, or the relationships formed between children and parents, impacts on sexual orientation.
- There is no evidence that same-sex orientation can be changed through ‘conversion’ or ‘reparative’ therapy.
- There is no evidence linking LGB sexual orientation or transgender and intersex people with the ‘recruitment’ of young people through childhood sexual abuse.
- There is clear evidence that more repressive environments increase minority stress and impact negatively on LGBTI health.
There is evidence that these laws cause negative consequences not only for LGBTI persons and communities through an increase in the levels of harassment and repression, but also for societies as a whole. These include the reversal of public health gains, such as in HIV and AIDS and other sexual health programmes, increases in levels of social violence, reduced economic growth, and the diversion of attention from sexual and other violence against women and children.
The full report Diversity in Human Sexuality: Implications for Policy in Africa is be available on http://www.assaf.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/8-June-Diversity-in-human-sexuality1.pdf