• Read the Report
  • Contact Us
Global Commission on HIV and the LawGlobal Commission on HIV and the LawGlobal Commission on HIV and the Law
Menu
  • Background
    • HIV and the Law
    • Commission Overview
    • Commissioners
    • Technical Advisory Group
  • Report
    • 2012 Report
    • 2018 Supplement
  • 10-10-10 Partnership
  • Dialogues
    • Global Dialogue 2018
      • 2018 Supplement
      • Global Dialogue 2018 Videos
    • Global Dialogue 2012
      • Video
      • Photo Gallery
      • Speeches
    • Regional Dialogues
      • Asia-Pacific Regional Dialogue
      • Caribbean
      • Eastern Europe and Central Asia
      • Latin America
      • Africa
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • High Income Countries
      • Civil Society Participation
      • Submissions to the Regional Dialogues
  • Implementation
    • Access to Health Technologies
      • Competition Law Guidance
      • Competition Law Webinar
      • 2022 Supplement
    • Civic Space
    • Digital
      • Guidance on the rights-based and ethical use of digital technologies
    • Programmes
      • Being LGBTI in Asia
      • Challenging stigma and discrimination in the Caribbean
      • Guidance for Prosecutors on HIV-related Criminal Cases
      • Improving SRHR for young key populations in Southern Africa
      • International Guidelines on Human Rights & Drug Policy
      • Multi-Country Western Pacific Integrated HIV/TB Project
      • Promoting a rights-based response to HIV in Africa
      • Removing legal barriers in Africa
      • South Asia Global Fund HIV Programme
      • UHC Legal Solutions Network
    • Follow Up
      • Follow Up Stories
      • Legal Environment Assessments
      • Leave No One Behind: Lessons from the Global Commission on HIV and the Law for Agenda 2030
  • Resources
    • eLibrary
      • Capacity Development Toolkits
      • Fact Sheets
      • Legal Environment Assessments, Reviews and Audits
      • National Dialogue Reports
      • Policy and Issue Briefs
      • Research, Discussion Papers and Reports
    • Evaluation of the Global Commission on HIV & the Law
    • Report & Working Papers
      • Read the Report
      • 2018 Supplement
      • Working Papers
      • Submissions
      • Presentations
      • Articles and Speeches from Commissioners
      • Selected Bibliographies
    • Regional Dialogue Resources
      • Asia-Pacific
      • Caribbean
      • Latin America
      • Eastern Europe and Central Asia
      • Africa
      • High Income Countries
    • HIV and the Law Animated Video
  • News
    • News Articles
    • Press Releases
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Past Events

5 Ways Harm Reduction Can Help Modernise Policing

Share this post

5 Ways Harm Reduction Can Help Modernise Policing

Published on Monday, 01 June 2015 16:42
Police are under constant scrutiny (some more than others) about their policing and law enforcement practices and priorities. Criticism sometimes centres on their lack of capacity to keep up with rapid changes in society. Communities, governments, and police officers themselves have called for reform and professionalisation through increased accountability, legitimacy and evidence-based policing in order to meet contemporary community needs. Harm reduction approaches (see definition here) can help police bridge some of these gaps.

Read on to find out how:

1. Professional policing: There are many definitions and interpretations of professional policing: here we see professionalism as involving fairness and diligence in responding to community concerns and reported crimes. Any person who reports a crime should have their allegations investigated by the police in a principled and timely manner – regardless of who they are and of their personal circumstances. Police often have negative perceptions about marginalised communities, which can result in police indifference to their victimisation. Police engagement with harm reduction programs helps change this. For example, when police investigate a report of sexual assault by a sex worker diligently and fully, despite the (most often) illegal nature of sex work and preconceptions of the victim.

2. Expands community policing: The concept of community policing has been widely accepted as a contemporary approach to problem solving local issues. It involves the participation of community in deciding how police services are delivered. Here, community policing not only refers to the participation of residents, but also representatives from local government agencies, businesses, non-government organisations, civil society and other service providers. Collaborations between these stakeholders encourage information exchange and can lead to determining shared objectives and local priorities. Better co-operation between police and key populations (people who use drugs, sex workers, men who have sex with men and others) contributes to a better work environment for police by encouraging more durable relationships, thus reducing adversarial interactions (conflict) and improving police officer safety.

3. Crime reduction through public health: Modern policing approaches acknowledge that crime reduction cannot be achieved by police on their own. In fact, solutions to crime prevention are often found outside of the criminal justice system. Take the public health sector, for example: harm reduction approaches such as opioid substitution therapy have been found to reduce the incidence of theft, robbery and burglary among users in numerous studies around the world. The police have a leadership role in supporting public health experts to provide these services which not only reduce crime, but also reduce drug overdoses and blood-borne viruses such as HIV.

4. Helps police make difficult decisions: Many police claim they have no choice but to enforce the law, but every day in every country around the world police use discretion to determine courses of action for a range of crime and order maintenance situations. If police decide to use discretion and not enforce the law in specific circumstances, their decision-making must be justified to their superiors and the community. For example, in deciding not to arrest a person using illicit drugs, police can refer to harm reduction research which provides a sound evidence-base to justify the ethical use of discretion for the purpose of reducing harm associated with drug use. The more police are aware of the evidence supporting harm reduction policing approaches, the more likely they are to have increased confidence in using discretion and justifying it when held to account.

5. Sharing international experiences: The Law Enforcement and HIV Network (LEAHN) provides a peer-to-peer approach for police to share their experiences regarding the effective implementation of harm reduction programs. By networking with police globally, police officers and their organisations as a whole can find new ways to solve local problems using international best practice whilst adapting solutions for each local context. LEAHN has a network of 17 senior police officers (called Country Focal Points) worldwide who support harm reduction and can help facilitate partnerships between local police and harm reduction providers and key populations.

Written by Melissa Jardine, former police officer, Editor of the LEAHN eNews and consultant to the Centre for Law Enforcement and Public Health. Follow us at @majardine and @LEAHNetwork.  

Source: LEAHN

Recent Posts

  • Legal empowerment is key to ending AIDS
  • UNDP and PEPFAR partnership to accelerate the removal of structural barriers to HIV services
  • Successfully expanding the rollout of PrEP in Indonesia
  • Decriminalizing HIV: Scientifically proven and morally correct
  • Ensuring sustainability of community-led HIV service delivery in Thailand

© 2017 [blog-link], All Rights Reserved.