• Read the Report
  • Contact Us
Menu
  • Background
    • HIV and the Law
    • Commission Overview
    • Commissioners
    • Technical Advisory Group
  • Dialogues
    • Global Dialogue 2018
      • 2018 Supplement
      • Global Dialogue 2018 Videos
    • Global Dialogue 2012
      • Video
      • Photo Gallery
      • Speeches
    • Regional Dialogues
      • Asia-Pacific Regional Dialogue
      • Caribbean
      • Eastern Europe and Central Asia
      • Latin America
      • Africa
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • High Income Countries
      • Civil Society Participation
      • Submissions to the Regional Dialogues
  • Implementation
    • Programmes
      • Being LGBTI in Asia
      • Challenging stigma and discrimination in the Caribbean
      • Improving SRHR for young key populations in Southern Africa
      • Multi-Country Western Pacific Integrated HIV/TB Project
      • Promoting a rights-based response to HIV in Africa
      • Removing legal barriers in Africa
      • South Asia Global Fund HIV Programme
      • UHC Legal Solutions Network
    • Follow Up
      • Follow Up Stories
      • Legal Environment Assessments
      • Leave No One Behind: Lessons from the Global Commission on HIV and the Law for Agenda 2030
  • Resources
    • International Guidelines on Human Rights & Drug Policy
    • eLibrary
      • Capacity Development Toolkits
      • Fact Sheets
      • Legal Environment Assessments, Reviews and Audits
      • National Dialogue Reports
      • Policy and Issue Briefs
      • Research, Discussion Papers and Reports
    • Report Resources
      • Read the Report
      • 2018 Supplement
      • Working Papers
      • Submissions
      • Presentations
      • Articles and Speeches from Commissioners
      • Selected Bibliographies
    • Regional Dialogue Resources
      • Asia-Pacific
      • Caribbean
      • Latin America
      • Eastern Europe and Central Asia
      • Africa
      • High Income Countries
  • News
    • News Articles
    • Press Releases
    • Newsletter Archives
  • Past Events
News

Criminal law out of step with science of HIV, advocates say

By katemcqdev

23/06/2014

Criminal law out of step with science of HIV, advocates say

Published on Monday, 23 June 2014 17:21
EDMONTON — When HIV-AIDS first hit North America in the 1980s, diagnosis almost always meant early death. As the virus spread out of control, the legal system began to see unprecedented cases: people with HIV charged with serious offences – most commonly aggravated sexual assault. Since the early 1990s, more than 150 HIV-positive people have been taken to court in Canada for not telling their sex partners they have the virus. But now that treatments have advanced to the point that HIV is no longer fatal nor easily transmitted, doctors argue the law is due for an update. “We were concerned that injustices were happening — or they could happen,” says Dr. Ryan Cooper, an infectious disease specialist from Edmonton. He was one of more than 70 Canadian HIV experts who recently released a consensus statement.  

View this the Consensus document on Scribd

The statement says HIV, properly treated, is now a manageable, chronic condition and that people with HIV have the same life expectancy as anyone else. It argues that scientific and medical evidence show there is low to no possibility of HIV transmission through sex, even without a condom. “When HIV is treated with anti-retroviral drugs … it becomes very hard to transmit,” Cooper says. “There’s a near-negligible chance of transmission.” Doctors and scientists have a duty to help those working in the criminal justice system understand the science of HIV, to prevent miscarriages of justice, the statement concludes. The problem with the current law, according to Cooper and many other HIV advocates, is that it is applied too broadly and with harsh results: According to theCanadian HIV-AIDS Legal Network, 78 per cent of cases have resulted in convictions.

Of those, 89 per cent led to jail time. In 1998, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that everyone with HIV had to disclosetheir status to sex partners, or face the possibility of charges. “It’s a really unusual fit, if you think about it,” says University of Alberta law professor Peter Sankoff. “Most sexual assault is a crime of violence. This is one of the few situations where two parties consensually get together.” “There is complete agreement as to every aspect of the sexual activity that takes place. The only thing that’s not agreed to is that some aspect of information has not passed between the two parties.” In 2012, the court updated the ruling, saying people with HIV did not have to disclose as long as they used a condom and had a low level of the virus — or viral load.

But advocates argue the two requirements for non-disclosure are unjust. For instance, people with mental illness, addictions or disabilities may not be able to maintain their medication to keep their viral load down. Or they may not have the capacity to tell a sex partner they have the virus. Those in abusive relationships may not be safe to disclose. Yet anyone with HIV can be charged with aggravated sexual assault and face a maximum penalty of life in prison. “We don’t apply the criminal law to any other infection, condition or public health issue,” says Cooper. “HIV is quite unique that way, and I think it’s unfair.”  

Source: Global News

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Recent Posts

  • People living with HIV in Kyrgyzstan have won the right to adopt
  • Legal and Policy Trends Impacting People Living with HIV and Key Populations in Asia and the Pacific 2014-2019
  • UNAIDS update: COVID-19 should not be a reason to delay 2030 deadline to end AIDS as a public health threat
  • 2020 Global HIV Policy Report: Policy Barriers to HIV Progress
  • UNAIDS hails new results showing that long-acting injectable medicines are highly effective in preventing HIV among women

© 2017 [blog-link], All Rights Reserved.